.jpg)
The recent Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) decision in Platinum Wheels (Pty) Ltd v The National Consumer Commission & Another shows just how quickly a business can skid off track when it comes to consumer protection and legal compliance. What began as a straightforward consumer complaint about a defective car soon veered into a legal twist involving a fraudulent legal representative. The result? A journey that no business owner would want to embark on. Let’s shift gears and see what lessons this case holds for businesses.
It all started with a second-hand BMW M5 sold by Platinum Wheels, a used car dealership. Shortly after the buyer drove it off the lot, the vehicle began experiencing serious mechanical issues. Within months, the engine gave up entirely. Understandably frustrated, the buyer lodged a complaint under South Africa’s Consumer Protection Act (CPA), which guarantees consumers the right to goods that are of acceptable quality, fit for purpose, and durable for a reasonable time. Platinum Wheels found itself in the hot seat, facing an adverse ruling by the National Consumer Tribunal and the High Court. In short, Platinum Wheels was ordered to repay the financed amount to the consumer.
But then came the unexpected twist. When the dealership appealed to the SCA, it was revealed that the legal representative for the National Consumer Commission – a key player in the case and acting indirectly on behalf of the consumer – was not authorised to practise law. This revelation, which called into question the integrity of the legal proceedings, led the SCA to overturn the High Court’s decision and order a rehearing. The result, another legal process needs to be followed by Platinum Wheels at great expense.
The ruling underscored two major issues that every business should pay attention to.
First, the case highlights the heavy responsibilities businesses bear under the CPA. Whether you’re selling used cars or any other products, ensuring your goods meet the required standards isn’t optional.
The Court highlighted the purpose of the CPA – to protect consumers and importantly, found albeit the consumer had taken the vehicle in for repairs with another entity, the duty on Platinum Wheels to provide a vehicle fit for its purpose remained in place and enforceable against it.
Poor quality or misrepresentation can lead to hefty penalties, refund orders, and reputational damage. Platinum Wheels learned this the hard way when their failure to meet the CPA’s standards brought legal and financial consequences.
Second, the saga serves as a stark reminder of the importance of integrity in legal representation. The Commission’s fraudulent legal counsel not only tarnished the administration of justice but also caused costly delays for all involved. While this wasn’t Platinum Wheels’ doing, the case illustrates how critical it is for businesses to ensure their legal representatives are qualified and trustworthy. Fraud or dishonesty in the legal process can derail even a well-prepared case, leaving businesses stuck in a costly legal quagmire.
For businesses of all sizes and industries, the lessons here are clear. Compliance with consumer protection laws is not just about ticking boxes – it’s about maintaining trust with customers and avoiding preventable disputes, and, if required, concede and settle the dispute. And when it comes to legal representation, cutting corners can leave you spinning your wheels in court for years at great expense.
Importantly, businesses should from time-to-time reconsider their stance in legal proceedings taking into consideration the legal expenses and time of litigating issues to finality, where there are questionable prospects of success.
So, what’s the takeaway? Stay in the driver’s seat when it comes to quality control, and always check under the bonnet of your legal strategy. The road to business success isn’t always smooth, but with diligence and integrity, you can steer clear of the pitfalls that derailed this case.
--
Read the full publication at Barnard
.jpg)
