The introduction of President Bola Tinubu’s Tax Reform Bill has sparked widespread debates across Nigeria. This proposed legislation aims to overhaul the country’s tax collection and administration systems, presenting an opportunity to create a more equitable and efficient taxation model. At the heart of the bill are transformative provisions, such as revisions to the Value Added Tax (VAT) revenue-sharing formula and exemptions for small businesses and the average Nigerians. While these changes could potentially revitalize Nigeria’s economy, they also expose critical issues within the country’s federal structure, particularly the economic imbalances among regions (States and Local Governments).
One of the most contentious aspects of the reform is the proposed VAT revenue-sharing formula. Under the new model, 60% of VAT revenue will be allocated to the state where goods and services were consumed, 20% distributed based on population, and the remaining 20% equally shared among all states. This marks a departure from the current system, where revenue is distributed based on where companies remit taxes, often in states with a high concentration of corporate headquarters like Lagos and Rivers. While the new model aims to ensure fairness by emphasizing consumption patterns, it has drawn intense criticism, especially from northern state governors and stakeholders who feel disadvantaged.
The governors’ main concern lies in the derivation-based model, which they argue unfairly shifts a larger share of the revenue to southern states. This approach could exacerbate existing economic disparities and disrupt Nigeria’s delicate balance of fiscal federalism. However, this resistance also discloses a deeper issue: the over-reliance of certain states on federal allocations instead of actively developing their internal revenue-generating capacities.
The proposed reforms are not without merit. For instance, exempting individuals earning less than ₦800,000 annually from income tax and small businesses with turnovers below ₦50 million from corporate tax offers much needed relief. These measures could strengthen economic activity by reducing the financial burden on vulnerable groups, ease the living status of working-class citizens, and enable small enterprises to reinvest in growth. Moreover, the introduction of taxes on digital assets modernizes Nigeria’s tax structure, aligning it with global standards and addressing the rapidly expanding digital economy.
Nonetheless, the reform’s success hinges on addressing regional concerns. While northern states grapple with legitimate challenges, including weak industrial bases and security issues, the solution lies in fostering economic self-reliance. States should be allowed to leverage their unique resources, such as agriculture in the North, to develop thriving local economies. The new VAT model offers an opportunity for states to innovate and focus on improving their internally generated revenue (IGR) through investments in infrastructure, education, and business-friendly policies.
The broader implication of the tax reform is the potential to redefine governance in Nigeria. By decentralizing tax administration to empower states and local governments, tax reform could encourage a shift toward more accountable and responsive leadership. While this transition will not be easy, it is a necessary step to reduce the country’s over-reliance on oil revenues and promote sustainable economic development.
The outcome of this reform process ultimately depends on transparent implementation and meaningful dialogue among stakeholders, the governors and the president. By encouraging fiscal autonomy, Nigeria can take a significant step to achieve sustainable growth and economic development.
President Tinubu’s Tax Reform Bill represents a pivotal moment for Nigeria. It offers an opportunity to create a tax system that not only funds essential services but also promotes trust, inclusivity, and collaboration. For this vision to be realized, stakeholders must engage in a transparent dialogue and ensure tax reform is implemented fairly and effectively. The path forward requires determination and cooperation, but the potential rewards will result in a more equitable and prosperous Nigeria.
--
Read the full publication at OAL
